<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Skepticrats &#187; Mark Sanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticrats.com/category/politicians/mark-sanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticrats.com</link>
	<description>You expect us to believe that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sanford may get lucky again</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/28/sanford-may-get-lucky-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/28/sanford-may-get-lucky-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, not that kind of lucky, as in &#8220;I hope you get lucky!&#8221; The kind of lucky that has one of the world&#8217;s most famous sex symbols and the world&#8217;s most famous accused pedophile and plastic surgery victim die the day after you announce your affair, thus bumping your admission out of the most-written about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not <em>that</em> kind of lucky, as in &#8220;I hope you get lucky!&#8221; The kind of lucky that has one of the world&#8217;s most famous <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20240288,00.html" target="_blank">sex symbols</a> and the world&#8217;s <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/25/michael-jackson-dies-death-dead-cardiac-arrest/" target="_blank">most famous accused pedophile and plastic surgery victim</a> die the day after <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/25/us/25sanford.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">you announce your affair</a>, thus bumping your admission out of the most-written about story slot.</p>
<p>Rumor has it there&#8217;s a <a href="http://trackacrat.com/2009/06/28/exit-stage-right/" target="_blank">John Edwards &#8211; Rielle Hunter sex tape</a> floating around out there. But I&#8217;m pretty sure there&#8217;s no truth to the rumor that Mark Sanford has mobilized the South Carolina National Guard and the state police in a dragnet to find the tape.</p>
<p>If it shows up, it will sure be interesting to see how the press handles the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/28/sanford-may-get-lucky-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have a special Rule 5 motion to make</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/25/i-have-a-special-rule-5-motion-to-make/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/25/i-have-a-special-rule-5-motion-to-make/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hereby move that there be no picures of Maria Belen Chapur allowed in any Rule 5 posts this week. Or ever. And that goes for anyone else&#8217;s &#8220;other woman.&#8221;
Just in case anyone&#8217;s thinking about it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hereby move that there be no picures of <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/25/sanfords-mistress-identified-professional-passionate-beautiful-brunette/" target="_blank">Maria Belen Chapur</a> allowed in any <a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/06/rule-5-sunday_21.html" target="_blank">Rule 5 posts</a> this week. Or ever. And that goes for anyone else&#8217;s &#8220;other woman.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just in case anyone&#8217;s thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/25/i-have-a-special-rule-5-motion-to-make/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanks a lot, Mark Sanford and John Ensign!</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/24/thanks-a-lot-mark-sanford-and-john-ensign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/24/thanks-a-lot-mark-sanford-and-john-ensign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John Ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Allahpundit writes at HotAir: &#8220;At the rate we’re going, I’m starting to think Obama might run unopposed in 2012.&#8221;
Can I make one simple request? If you&#8217;re going to cat around, stay a low-level party hack! Ensign and Sanford were chair of the Republican Policy Committee and chair of the Republican Governors Association, respectively. Cripes!
In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Allahpundit writes at HotAir: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/06/24/video-the-freaky-deaky-mark-sanford-press-conference/" target="_blank">&#8220;At the rate we’re going, I’m starting to think Obama might run unopposed in 2012.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Can I make one simple request? If you&#8217;re going to cat around, stay a low-level party hack! Ensign and Sanford were <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/16/ensign.affair/index.html" target="_blank">chair of the Republican Policy Committee</a> and chair of the <a href="http://www.rga.org/" target="_blank">Republican Governors Association</a>, respectively. Cripes!</p>
<p>In that context, I might have been willing to cut John Kerry a break for his <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/20090624john_kerry_says_wrong_gov_missing_for_four_days/srvc=home&amp;position=0" target="_blank">class-less joke about how he wished Sarah Palin had been the one to go missing</a> — had Kerry made that &#8220;joke&#8221; <em>after</em> Sanford&#8217;s announcement. Then, it would have made sense because Palin would have been one more high-profile Republican and genuine contender for 2012 getting knocked out of the saddle. Coming as it did <em>before</em> Sanford&#8217;s announcement, however, Kerry&#8217;s comment is just bizarre.</p>
<p>By the way, one thing Sanford apparently doesn&#8217;t deserve to be <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/24/bastard/" target="_blank">raked over the coals</a> for is leaving his family over Father&#8217;s day weekend. Apparently, his wife asked him to move out a couple of weeks ago and their existing arrangement was that Sanford &#8220;<a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/70632.html" target="_blank">would not contact</a>&#8221; his family. She and Ensign&#8217;s wife have both been class acts. I hope they can heal their marriages out of the spotlights.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>Media Matters notes that Fox News <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200906240026" target="_blank">displayed a &#8220;D&#8221; after Sanford&#8217;s name</a> in its report on the confession, misidentifying Sanford as a Democrat. I&#8217;m sure MM thinks it was something nefarious, but I&#8217;m thinking the graphics guy was just thinking <em>Dumbass</em> when he put that &#8220;D&#8221; up on the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/24/thanks-a-lot-mark-sanford-and-john-ensign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Mark Sanford&#8217;s wife . . . comfortable, putting up a good front, or crazy?</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/23/governor-mark-sanfords-wife-comfortable-putting-up-a-good-front-or-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/23/governor-mark-sanfords-wife-comfortable-putting-up-a-good-front-or-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the saga of Governor Mark Sanford&#8217;s unexpected incommunicado status, Karol at Alarming News picked up on Sanford&#8217;s wife&#8217;s apparent nonchalance. Wrote Karol:
His wife is not worried because, get this, &#8220;the governor said he needed time away from their children to write something.&#8221; Shaaaaaaaaaady.
I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;d consider it shady if Elliott Spitzer were missing at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the saga of Governor Mark Sanford&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/836552.html" target="_blank">unexpected </a><em><a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/836552.html" target="_blank">incommunicado</a></em><a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/836552.html" target="_blank"> status</a>, Karol at Alarming News picked up on Sanford&#8217;s wife&#8217;s <a href="http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/008255.html" target="_blank">apparent nonchalance</a>. Wrote Karol:</p>
<blockquote><p>His wife is not worried because, get this, &#8220;the governor said he needed time away from their children to write something.&#8221; Shaaaaaaaaaady.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;d consider it shady if Elliott Spitzer were missing at the same time and there was a chance the two of them were out together. But as a professional tethered to work by technology nearly 24/7, I sure can understand the need to get away from it all, even if that means ditching your security detail (not that I have one). Perhaps getting out unexpectedly was the only way Sanford could do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/23/governor-mark-sanfords-wife-comfortable-putting-up-a-good-front-or-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

