<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Skepticrats &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticrats.com/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticrats.com</link>
	<description>You expect us to believe that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Immigrants from years past are spinning in their graves</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/07/11/immigrants-from-years-past-are-spinning-in-their-graves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/07/11/immigrants-from-years-past-are-spinning-in-their-graves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=2037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of them, anyway.  Consider this typically witty essay by Mark Steyn on the use of environmentalism to control the masses:
Capitalism is liberating: You’re born a peasant but you don’t have to die one. You can work hard and get a nice place in the suburbs. If you were a 19th century Russian peasant and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of them, anyway.  Consider this <a href="http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/07/10/top_stories/doc4a576b0ec9caa441243158.txt" target="_blank">typically witty essay by Mark Steyn</a> on the use of environmentalism to control the masses:</p>
<blockquote><p><span>Capitalism is liberating: You’re born a peasant but you don’t have to die one. You can work hard and get a nice place in the suburbs. If you were a 19th century Russian peasant and you got to Ellis Island, you’d be living in a tenement on the Lower East Side, but your kids would get an education and move uptown, and your grandkids would be doctors and accountants in Westchester County.</p>
<p>And your great-grandchild would be a Harvard-educated environmental activist demanding an end to all this electricity and indoor toilets.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>H/T: <a href="http://www.punditandpundette.com/" target="_blank">Pundette</a>.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/07/11/immigrants-from-years-past-are-spinning-in-their-graves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ever wonder why reporting on environmental issues seems so nonsensical?</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/05/ever-wonder-why-reporting-on-environmental-issues-seems-so-nonsensical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/05/ever-wonder-why-reporting-on-environmental-issues-seems-so-nonsensical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the caption accompanying the below photo in our newspaper is any indication, it is because journalists reporting on environmental issues are wearing a pemanent pair of beer goggles, finding beauty where there is none.  Here&#8217;s what the paper called &#8220;a meandering arroyo and a sustainable landscape of flowering, drought-tolerant native or Mediterranean plants&#8221;:

If that looks to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the caption accompanying the below photo in <a href="http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/apr/04/sustainable-landscapes-let-soil-absorb-runoff/" target="_self">our newspaper</a> is any indication, it is because journalists reporting on environmental issues are wearing a pemanent pair of beer goggles, finding beauty where there is none.  Here&#8217;s what the paper called &#8220;a meandering arroyo and a sustainable landscape of flowering, drought-tolerant native or Mediterranean plants&#8221;:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1305" title="backyard" src="http://www.skepticrats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/backyard.jpg" alt="backyard" width="600" height="397" /></p>
<p>If that looks to you like a couple of scattered shrubs on a giant dirt lot (and a giant mud pit after the next hard rain), you&#8217;re not alone.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s with the <em>size</em> of that back yard? The owner of the yard said “We wanted to teach our children about sustainable living and self sufficiency.” So why is her backyard alone triple the size of my entire lot? Most California environmentalists would advocate at least one or two dozen families of four living in that space in some kind of &#8220;smart development.&#8221; Evidently, mudpits are permissible sprawl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/05/ever-wonder-why-reporting-on-environmental-issues-seems-so-nonsensical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
