<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t take that tone of voice with me, mister! The new rule for political debate and news coverage.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/10/21/dont-take-that-tone-of-voice-with-me-mister-the-new-rule-for-political-debate-and-news-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/10/21/dont-take-that-tone-of-voice-with-me-mister-the-new-rule-for-political-debate-and-news-coverage/</link>
	<description>You expect us to believe that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NeoLibertarianDotCom</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/10/21/dont-take-that-tone-of-voice-with-me-mister-the-new-rule-for-political-debate-and-news-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoLibertarianDotCom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=2465#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>I think this is actually an under-discussed part of Alinskyism.  The polarization that Alinskyism wants comes from the obvious path of painting your opponents as extreme but it also comes from white-washing your own group&#039;s extremism.  This makes it much easier for moderates to migrate to your position through use of a classic negotiating tactic: when you seek to make one position appear untenable, you also provide an easy, and face saving, alternative to make it easier for people to come to your side.

  Thus I disagree that this is the result of a thin skinned or inexperienced administration not being able to take criticism: this is Alinsky tactics at a level of ruthlessness and sophistication far above what we have seen from the Left before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is actually an under-discussed part of Alinskyism.  The polarization that Alinskyism wants comes from the obvious path of painting your opponents as extreme but it also comes from white-washing your own group&#8217;s extremism.  This makes it much easier for moderates to migrate to your position through use of a classic negotiating tactic: when you seek to make one position appear untenable, you also provide an easy, and face saving, alternative to make it easier for people to come to your side.</p>
<p>  Thus I disagree that this is the result of a thin skinned or inexperienced administration not being able to take criticism: this is Alinsky tactics at a level of ruthlessness and sophistication far above what we have seen from the Left before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

