<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kennedy&#8217;s dead, so now all of a sudden I&#8217;m gung-ho for Obamacare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/08/27/kennedys-dead-so-now-all-of-a-sudden-im-gung-ho-for-obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/08/27/kennedys-dead-so-now-all-of-a-sudden-im-gung-ho-for-obamacare/</link>
	<description>You expect us to believe that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More Rule #2 &#171; The TrogloPundit</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/08/27/kennedys-dead-so-now-all-of-a-sudden-im-gung-ho-for-obamacare/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>More Rule #2 &#171; The TrogloPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=2315#comment-793</guid>
		<description>[...] Personally, I’d love to see some bipartisanship in the Obamacare debate. If that means liberals coming over to my side, that is. But Deuce Geary thinks that&#8217;s not what they mean by bipartisanship. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Personally, I’d love to see some bipartisanship in the Obamacare debate. If that means liberals coming over to my side, that is. But Deuce Geary thinks that&#8217;s not what they mean by bipartisanship. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert L.  www.neolibertarian.com</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/08/27/kennedys-dead-so-now-all-of-a-sudden-im-gung-ho-for-obamacare/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert L.  www.neolibertarian.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=2315#comment-792</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ironic that bi-partisanship is being called for when Kennedy&#039;s last legislative act was to ask for Democrats in Massachusetts to repeal the law mandating a special election to replace him.  That law was specifically put in place to prevent then governor Mitt Romney from appointing a Republican replacement if Kerry won the presidency.  Now, with a Democrat governor, the law suddenly and cynically needs to be changed to allow immediate appointment of another yes vote for healthcare &quot;reform.&quot;  It&#039;s one last burst of hypocrisy from the private school boy who fought school choice and the health care advocate who never would have had to go near the coverage he championed and whose inherited wealth made sure he never would have dealt with the economic wreckage that would ensue.

BTW: for record setting stupidity in the comments about his passing, which is saying something, check out this: http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/08/28/huffpo-blogger-maybe-mary-jo-kopechne-wouldnt-have-minded-dying-for-teds-career/

It&#039;s eerie how well Iowa Hawk predicted this line of argument: http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/you-stay-here-while-i-swim-and-get-us-some-universal-health-care.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic that bi-partisanship is being called for when Kennedy&#8217;s last legislative act was to ask for Democrats in Massachusetts to repeal the law mandating a special election to replace him.  That law was specifically put in place to prevent then governor Mitt Romney from appointing a Republican replacement if Kerry won the presidency.  Now, with a Democrat governor, the law suddenly and cynically needs to be changed to allow immediate appointment of another yes vote for healthcare &#8220;reform.&#8221;  It&#8217;s one last burst of hypocrisy from the private school boy who fought school choice and the health care advocate who never would have had to go near the coverage he championed and whose inherited wealth made sure he never would have dealt with the economic wreckage that would ensue.</p>
<p>BTW: for record setting stupidity in the comments about his passing, which is saying something, check out this: <a href="http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/08/28/huffpo-blogger-maybe-mary-jo-kopechne-wouldnt-have-minded-dying-for-teds-career/" rel="nofollow">http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/08/28/huffpo-blogger-maybe-mary-jo-kopechne-wouldnt-have-minded-dying-for-teds-career/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s eerie how well Iowa Hawk predicted this line of argument: <a href="http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/you-stay-here-while-i-swim-and-get-us-some-universal-health-care.html" rel="nofollow">http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/you-stay-here-while-i-swim-and-get-us-some-universal-health-care.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

