<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Detractors Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/27/sarah-palins-detractors-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/27/sarah-palins-detractors-explained/</link>
	<description>You expect us to believe that?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert L. www.neolibertarian.com</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/27/sarah-palins-detractors-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert L. www.neolibertarian.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1799#comment-587</guid>
		<description>As Janeane Garofalo will be happy to explain to you, if you are a white conservative voting against Obama you are either racist, mentally deranged, or both and thus not of the &quot;real&quot; white people.  Rather than wearing a false color or sex (like Clarence or Sarah), you wear the simulacrum of a rational white person, when in fact you are some sort of hate driven animal.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;&quot;This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up . . . .  the limbic brain inside a right-winger or Republican or conservative or your average white power activist, the limbic brain is much larger in their head space than in a reasonable person, and it&#039;s pushing against the frontal lobe.&quot;
--- Garofalo speaking to Keith Olberman
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Janeane Garofalo will be happy to explain to you, if you are a white conservative voting against Obama you are either racist, mentally deranged, or both and thus not of the &#8220;real&#8221; white people.  Rather than wearing a false color or sex (like Clarence or Sarah), you wear the simulacrum of a rational white person, when in fact you are some sort of hate driven animal.</p>
<blockquote cite=""><p>&#8220;This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up . . . .  the limbic brain inside a right-winger or Republican or conservative or your average white power activist, the limbic brain is much larger in their head space than in a reasonable person, and it&#8217;s pushing against the frontal lobe.&#8221;<br />
&#8212; Garofalo speaking to Keith Olberman
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deuce Geary</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/27/sarah-palins-detractors-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1799#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Robert L.,

Hmmm, I&#039;m confused. I&#039;m not sure whether a majority of whites voted for Obama. So how am I supposed to know if I&#039;m still white?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert L.,</p>
<p>Hmmm, I&#8217;m confused. I&#8217;m not sure whether a majority of whites voted for Obama. So how am I supposed to know if I&#8217;m still white?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert L.  www.neolibertarian.com</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/06/27/sarah-palins-detractors-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert L.  www.neolibertarian.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1799#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I think the second quote is closer to the truth than the first, but my take is different: The mean green far left is inherently collectivist and therefore cannot admit that individuals within a collective group might have diverse opinions and standards.  &lt;em&gt;Therefore dissenters cannot belong to the group.&lt;/em&gt;

The mean green left world view is that they are an Avant Garde that speaks for, and protects, entire groups, especially &quot;victim&quot; groups, like women and minorities.  This idea is the source of their moral authority and the justification for their use of collectivist tactics.

Implicitly this depends on the idea that there is a &lt;em&gt;monolithic&lt;/em&gt; &quot;will of the people&quot; to be protected and implemented.

Therefore prominent people from victim groups who oppose the mean green party line cannot be admitted to be from those groups because this attacks the core justification for collectivism: a monolithic world view of the people within that group.

The result of this are nonsensical attacks: Sarah Palin is not a woman, Clarence Thomas isn&#039;t black, etc etc etc  No matter how absurd these statements are per se, they must be made because the alternative is to admit a fundamental problem with collectivist ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the second quote is closer to the truth than the first, but my take is different: The mean green far left is inherently collectivist and therefore cannot admit that individuals within a collective group might have diverse opinions and standards.  <em>Therefore dissenters cannot belong to the group.</em></p>
<p>The mean green left world view is that they are an Avant Garde that speaks for, and protects, entire groups, especially &#8220;victim&#8221; groups, like women and minorities.  This idea is the source of their moral authority and the justification for their use of collectivist tactics.</p>
<p>Implicitly this depends on the idea that there is a <em>monolithic</em> &#8220;will of the people&#8221; to be protected and implemented.</p>
<p>Therefore prominent people from victim groups who oppose the mean green party line cannot be admitted to be from those groups because this attacks the core justification for collectivism: a monolithic world view of the people within that group.</p>
<p>The result of this are nonsensical attacks: Sarah Palin is not a woman, Clarence Thomas isn&#8217;t black, etc etc etc  No matter how absurd these statements are per se, they must be made because the alternative is to admit a fundamental problem with collectivist ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

