Pathetic plea for attention:

Bookmark and Share

Contact

BlogFlux Tools

Deuce Geary
Deuce Geary
Create Your Badge

Believe nothing and be on your guard against everything.
— Latin Proverb

But we're not skeptical about everything.

Not One Red Cent Logo

coldhungryobama

Stimulus “Consensus”

Blogroll

Probation

Sarah Palin’s Detractors Explained

I like Sarah Palin a lot. I’m not sure I’d support a presidential run, and I worry that she was too gravely wounded in the 2008 election to recover, especially in time for 2012. But I do love her not just for her values, but for her ability to bring out the worst (or the soul) of the Left. I enjoy watching the vitriol direct against her, because it exposes so much about those spewing it.

With several blogs devoted to Palin, she really doesn’t need me to stick up for her. But two recent articles at The American Thinker caught my eye for their analyses of two classes of Palin detractors.

First up is writer/singer Lloyd Marcus, who starts by comparing Sarah Palin to Gary Cooper in High Noon, and then writes:

Why are Obama and his gang so committed and desperate to destroy Palin? Could it be they recognize her destiny, like that of Moses, to set her people free? And why is she so despised by them? Obama’s gang hate Palin for all the reasons we love her. Sheriff Palin is a good, decent and strong character driven conservative leader. Palin also believes in God. Such humility and virtues are as repulsive to liberals as showing Dracula the cross.

Something that sticks in the craw of many liberal women is that in their youth, they brought into the feminist rhetoric that women’s liberation means no husband and family. Tragically, they find themselves aging and alone. Meanwhile, this conservative woman has it all: great career, fine family and a husband who loves and respects her. Adding insult in injury, Sheriff Palin looks mighty fine in her jeans.

She is seen as a threat and she’s not allowed to be happy because she’s not a feminist. OK, that’s about right. Stuart Schwartz explores that feminist angle in depth, specifically in contrast to the cultural movement surrounding Eve Ensler’s Vagina Monologues:

The Washington Post, which has devoted much of the past decade celebrating the Ensler culture, nastily declared that her “greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman.”  Those were among the kinder words written by one of its showcased writers on faith, a University of Chicago divinity school professor who also derisively noted that someone who “has a womb and makes lots and lots of babies (and drives them to school! wow!)” does not a woman make.

So what does make a woman…politically, that is? Hate and cultural conformity, to judge by the venom spilling from the nation’s elite.  Ensler promotes this, exhorting women to “vote with your vaginas” and put Democrats in office. She has urged them “to get our vaginas to the polls”, in this last election warning that a vote for Palin is the equivalent of a vote for rape…the bad kind. Women — and those non-traditional men who have escaped gender stereotypes to embrace a walk down the “vagina trail” — should ask themselves: what would your vagina do?

Conservatives knew all this already, but I’m hoping that this kind of thing is being noticed beyond the grassroots.

Bookmark and Share

3 comments to Sarah Palin’s Detractors Explained

  • I think the second quote is closer to the truth than the first, but my take is different: The mean green far left is inherently collectivist and therefore cannot admit that individuals within a collective group might have diverse opinions and standards. Therefore dissenters cannot belong to the group.

    The mean green left world view is that they are an Avant Garde that speaks for, and protects, entire groups, especially “victim” groups, like women and minorities. This idea is the source of their moral authority and the justification for their use of collectivist tactics.

    Implicitly this depends on the idea that there is a monolithic “will of the people” to be protected and implemented.

    Therefore prominent people from victim groups who oppose the mean green party line cannot be admitted to be from those groups because this attacks the core justification for collectivism: a monolithic world view of the people within that group.

    The result of this are nonsensical attacks: Sarah Palin is not a woman, Clarence Thomas isn’t black, etc etc etc No matter how absurd these statements are per se, they must be made because the alternative is to admit a fundamental problem with collectivist ideology.

    • Deuce Geary

      Robert L.,

      Hmmm, I’m confused. I’m not sure whether a majority of whites voted for Obama. So how am I supposed to know if I’m still white?

  • As Janeane Garofalo will be happy to explain to you, if you are a white conservative voting against Obama you are either racist, mentally deranged, or both and thus not of the “real” white people. Rather than wearing a false color or sex (like Clarence or Sarah), you wear the simulacrum of a rational white person, when in fact you are some sort of hate driven animal.

    “This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up . . . . the limbic brain inside a right-winger or Republican or conservative or your average white power activist, the limbic brain is much larger in their head space than in a reasonable person, and it’s pushing against the frontal lobe.”
    — Garofalo speaking to Keith Olberman

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Your incentive to comment:
This blog is running the BlogFollow plugin.  If you comment on a post an excerpt from your latest blog will appear below your comment.