The “Church” of Scientology vs. Wikipedia
On a related subject, I have never understood why Scientology has ever been considered a religion at all. I don’t claim to know a lot about it — I’ve never read Dianetics and, from what I understand, the “church” keeps much of its doctrine secret even from its adherents, who are gradually allowed to learn more as they advance toward their ultimate state. When I’ve seen celebrities like Tom Cruise and John Travolta promote it, they do so usually by describing only its benefits, not what it is. But this, I know: I have never heard a single scientology outlet — not a celebrity, not a man on the street, not someone at the scientology booth at a street fair, no scientology pamphlet, no scientology print advertisement, no scientology billboard — mention God. So how, exactly, is it a religion? 1 comment to The “Church” of Scientology vs. WikipediaYour incentive to comment: |
||
|
Copyright © 2012 The Skepticrats - All Rights Reserved |
||
Buddhism doesn't mention God either and that's generally accepted as a religion. (Sensitive on this point, Hubbard did compare Scientology to Buddhism.)
(Disclaimer: I'm an ardent critic of Scientology, see website at http://suburbia.net/~fun/scn/ )