Comments on: On what’s good for the gander . . . should Republicans filibuster Obama’s nominees? http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/01/on-whats-good-for-the-gander-should-republicans-filibuster-obamas-nominees/ You expect us to believe that? Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: You want relentless? Here’s your relentless. | The Skepticrats http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/01/on-whats-good-for-the-gander-should-republicans-filibuster-obamas-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-562 You want relentless? Here’s your relentless. | The Skepticrats Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:54:32 +0000 http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1284#comment-562 [...] as tired as the next conservative of Republicans bringing knives to gunfights. But a campaign to get Letterman fired doesn’t really fit into the type of fight that [...] [...] as tired as the next conservative of Republicans bringing knives to gunfights. But a campaign to get Letterman fired doesn’t really fit into the type of fight that [...]

]]> By: Anita Hill’s dead giveaway on judicial philosophy | The Skepticrats http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/01/on-whats-good-for-the-gander-should-republicans-filibuster-obamas-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-481 Anita Hill’s dead giveaway on judicial philosophy | The Skepticrats Sat, 02 May 2009 03:25:30 +0000 http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1284#comment-481 [...] again, as Robert L. from Neo-Libertarian at Large noted in a comment on my post about filibustering radical judicial nominees: I think part of the dilemma is that there [...] [...] again, as Robert L. from Neo-Libertarian at Large noted in a comment on my post about filibustering radical judicial nominees: I think part of the dilemma is that there [...]

]]> By: Arlen, you magnificent bastard! | The Skepticrats http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/01/on-whats-good-for-the-gander-should-republicans-filibuster-obamas-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-480 Arlen, you magnificent bastard! | The Skepticrats Fri, 01 May 2009 10:00:01 +0000 http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1284#comment-480 [...] first, that revelation was rather heartening. As you may know, I have no qualms about Republicans doing everything in their power to defeat a truly radical nominee (and you know [...] [...] first, that revelation was rather heartening. As you may know, I have no qualms about Republicans doing everything in their power to defeat a truly radical nominee (and you know [...]

]]> By: Robert L. www.neolibertarian.com http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/04/01/on-whats-good-for-the-gander-should-republicans-filibuster-obamas-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-400 Robert L. www.neolibertarian.com Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:51:22 +0000 http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1284#comment-400 I think part of the dilemma is that there is a game of chicken going on over who is going to be the first to admit that SCOTUS has turned into just another legislative/political body. Both parties, the Republicans very belatedly, are increasingly maneuvering based on this assumption but the messenger on this issue will definitely be shot. I think part of the dilemma is that there is a game of chicken going on over who is going to be the first to admit that SCOTUS has turned into just another legislative/political body.

Both parties, the Republicans very belatedly, are increasingly maneuvering based on this assumption but the messenger on this issue will definitely be shot.

Read more from Robert L. http://www.neolibertarian.com

Are These People Too Media Savvy To Be Conservatives?

The Dallas Tea Party answers Keith Olbermann’s charges of racism with reason, civility, media savvy and snark

]]>