Comments on: If the death threats were directed at gays instead of bonus-receiving AIG execs, do you think Barney Frank would refuse confidentiality?

Comments on: If the death threats were directed at gays instead of bonus-receiving AIG execs, do you think Barney Frank would refuse confidentiality? http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/03/18/if-the-death-threats-were-directed-at-gays-instead-of-bonus-receiving-aig-execs-do-you-think-barney-frank-would-refuse-confidentiality/ You expect us to believe that? Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:01:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: The new Scarlet Letter: It ain’t “A” for adultery – it’s “A” for A.I.G. « Danishova http://www.skepticrats.com/2009/03/18/if-the-death-threats-were-directed-at-gays-instead-of-bonus-receiving-aig-execs-do-you-think-barney-frank-would-refuse-confidentiality/comment-page-1/#comment-364 The new Scarlet Letter: It ain’t “A” for adultery – it’s “A” for A.I.G. « Danishova Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:43:13 +0000 http://www.skepticrats.com/?p=1202#comment-364 [...] A brilliant rhetorical question is posed at The Skepticrats: [...] [...] A brilliant rhetorical question is posed at The Skepticrats: [...]

]]>