Why do heavier women have more sex than "normal sized" women?I don’t agree with these guys at all:
How hard do you have to think to come up with something that bone-headed? If members of the medical community are counseling heavier women differently because of an assumption that they don’t have much sex, then shame on them. Not just for depriving these women of good advice, but for thinking something so stupid. The world is full of people of all shapes and sizes and tastes of all sorts. But even if the counseling is different, I really doubt that accounts for the difference. First, I’d like to know how this study defined “overweight” or “obese.” Since the article refers to Body Mass Index, I tend to discount this study entirely. (Any system that classifies Michael Jordan during his playing days as “overweight” is suspect.) So if the article considers anyone heavier than Keira Knightly to be overweight, then just throw out the study completely. But assuming the study is a little more reasonable on this, there are sure better explanations than the one quoted above. How about the possibility that women who obsess about their weight to the point they can’t even enjoy a meal might just be a little more high strung and less likely to enjoy life than women who are a little more relaxed about food? I have to admit that’s a borrowed theory. A friend who’s wife was overweight once explained, “You don’t want a woman that doesn’t enjoy food. A woman who doesn’t enjoy the sensual experience of eating isn’t likely to enjoy other sensual experiences.” I think he was on to something. (Granted, not all thin women are obsessive. Keira Knightly, for instance, reputedly eats like a horse.) Here’s another shocking possibility: maybe a lot of men don’t go for bean poles. Ever think about that? H/T: HotAir. |
||
|
Copyright © 2012 The Skepticrats - All Rights Reserved |
||